Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note4, getting a global score of 80 against 77.6. The Google Pixel 3 is a way newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note4. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy Note4 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has slightly more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.