Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 439 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, with a general score of 80 against 76.9. Google Pixel 3 is a lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite higher pixels number per inch of display.
The Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy On7 Prime. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.