Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than Google Pixel 3, with a 93.6 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3, but it's way heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a larger display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Galaxy S10 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with lesser mega-pixels, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.