Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 89.7 score against 80. Even though Galaxy S10 Lite is newer than Google Pixel 3, it's just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.