Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, having a global score of 86.3 against 80. Galaxy S10e's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3, but it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 and Galaxy S10e both have extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10e has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lower resolution back camera, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.