Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 90.8 against 80. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a much bigger sensor.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.