Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than Google Pixel 3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.