Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel 3, with a 95.4 score against 80. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably newer phone than Google Pixel 3, although it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 and the Galaxy S22 Ultra feature similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.