Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 80. The Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.