Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Google Pixel 3, with a 90.7 score against 80. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is lighter and extremely thinner than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit higher pixels density and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% more battery capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.