Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 80 score against 77.8. The Google Pixel 3 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Galaxy S5 Sport's processor is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 one, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has lesser RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a little bit worse pixel density, a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport and Google Pixel 3 both count with quite similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.