Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 81 score against 80. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, but it's way thicker and noticeably heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 3 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a camera that's just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 3, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot tinier sensor shooting way worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.