Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, getting an 85.6 score against 80. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is incredibly newer and thinner than Google Pixel 3's, although it's heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Google Pixel 3 both have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a larger display. The Google Pixel 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also has a back-facing camera with a better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.