Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Google Pixel 3, with a 92.3 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Google Pixel 3 count with similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with lesser megapixels, they both have a same size aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.