Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Google Pixel 3, having a global score of 94.6 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it's heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% more battery capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a worse resolution camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.