Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZs, with a overall score of 80 against 77.2. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Sony Xperia XZs. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better CPU than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a little bit larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit better screen density. The Sony Xperia XZs features more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Sony Xperia XZs's battery performance is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 one, although the Sony Xperia XZs has 2900mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Xperia XZs features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a lot higher 19 mega-pixels resolution and faster 960 frames per second video frame rate.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.