Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia Z4v's score of 78.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is extremely newer, just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than Sony Xperia Z4v. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Xperia Z4v features a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels amount per display inch. The Xperia Z4v features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. Xperia Z4v has a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.