Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting an 80 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 3 is an way older cellphone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Google was able to make it notably lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.