Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-04-04 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a score of 80 against 78.7. The Google Pixel 3 is an way older phone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but Google managed to build it incredibly lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 60 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.