Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's 77.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 construction is newer and lighter, but just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 3 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also has a camera in the back with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has an 82 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.