Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-10-10 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a general score of 81.2 against 80. Even though Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is older and notably heavier than Google Pixel 3, it's body is still just a little thinner. Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2160 resolution, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.