Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, with a score of 83.8 against 80. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is just a bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2160 resolution, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's camera is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 one, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, they both have a same size sensor and a F1.8 aperture. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.