Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a score of 80 against 78.7. The Google Pixel 3 design is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The Google Pixel 3 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.