Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. The Google Pixel 3 design is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X2, even though it was released around 16 months before. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Google Pixel 3 and Xiaomi Poco X2 have incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% more battery size. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.