Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, having an 80 score against 78.3. Google Pixel 3's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite worse pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.