Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 82.4 score against 80. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a lot newer than Google Pixel 3, it's notably heavier and a little bit thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Google Pixel 3 both count with really similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a way better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.