Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 general score. Google Pixel 3's construction is incredibly lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better pixels density and a way higher 2080 x 2400 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.