Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a general score of 80 against 76.6. The Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 2915mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.