Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. The Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but Google could make it somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.