Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 score. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent more battery size.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.