Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 83.3 score against 78.9. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Apple iPhone 11 body is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a XL. Apple iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a XL works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Apple iPhone 11 counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as Google Pixel 3a XL, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 11 has a better CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Google Pixel 3a XL has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size back camera sensor and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 11, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.