Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a XL comes with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 13 Pro is a way newer and just a little thinner device than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's heavier.
IPhone 13 Pro has a quite superior performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and 2 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution.
IPhone 13 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a worse video definition and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. IPhone 13 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 3a XL features superior battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.