Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a score of 93.2 against 78.9. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a way newer and a little bit thinner phone than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is much heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher 1284 x 2778px resolution, a little bit larger display and a quite better display pixel density. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.