Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's a little thinner and newer. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a XL counts with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and 2 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 14 Pro features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels, a bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a back camera with much more megapixels and faster video frame rates. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features just a bit better battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.