Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a lot better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a 94.9 score against 78.9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a XL comes with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little greater pixels quantity per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1290 x 2796 resolution. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a greater amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with way more MP.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.