Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a global score of 88.1 against 78.9. Although the Apple iPhone X is older and a little heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it's body is still just a bit thinner. Apple iPhone X has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone X features a better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone X features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality photos, a camera in the back with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
IPhone X features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.