Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, iPhone XR's design is heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL. The iPhone XR features a faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone XR features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little lower pixels density and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, it also counts with a little larger screen. IPhone XR captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, they both have the same back camera sensor size and the same diafragm aperture.
The iPhone XR counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Google Pixel 3a XL one, both have equal internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with greater battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.