Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 general score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a way older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Honor 50 Pro, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM. Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a just a little greater screen pixel density, a better 1236 x 2676 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Honor 50 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage. Honor 50 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.