Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 402 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is incredibly newer, but a bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. These phones use Android operating system, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better performing CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution, a little larger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 960 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a lot bigger aperture, a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, better 60 fps video frame rates and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.