Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, having a general score of 78.9 against 77. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a little faster CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has 4 more cores (but slower). LG G7 Fit has a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit larger display, more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit's camera is just as good as the Google Pixel 3a XL one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a smaller sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.