Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a score of 81 against 78.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The LG G7 ThinQ body is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 3a XL, even though it was released around 11 months before.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little bit larger display.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL features superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG G7 ThinQ costs a bit more than Google Pixel 3a XL, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.