Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Although it's the best device we compare here, we must note that it is also a a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little more pixels per screen inch and a little bit bigger display. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG G8X ThinQ takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a worse resolution, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size and a F1.8 aperture. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.