Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a score of 85.4 against 78.9. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the LG K92 has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. LG K92's design is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it is a little thicker and heavier.
LG K92 and Google Pixel 3a XL count with very similar screens, because although the LG K92 has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger display. LG K92 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has more RAM. LG K92 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels back camera.
The LG K92 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG K92, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.