Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, giving some additional features. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is a bit thinner and extremely lighter than LG Stylo 6, although it was released about 13 months before.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The LG Stylo 6 counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a way better (4K) video resolution. The LG Stylo 6 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.