Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is slightly better than LG V10's 78.6 overall score. Google Pixel 3a XL is a much newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG V10. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit superior CPU than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a higher number of cores. The LG V10 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels density.
The LG V10 features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL features improved battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
The LG V10 takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rate.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.