Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Google Pixel 3a XL, although it was released just 11 months before. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.