Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 78.9. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it is a little thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The LG V60 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. LG V60 ThinQ features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.