Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Even though LG Velvet is just a bit heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's just a little thinner and also newer. LG Velvet counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. LG Velvet takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
LG Velvet counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG Velvet features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
The LG Velvet is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.