Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. LG Wing's design is newer, but extremely heavier and noticeably thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
LG Wing counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. The LG Wing features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Wing captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rate, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
LG Wing counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing features just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.