Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a global score of 92.8 against 78.9. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has improved battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.